Funny cartoon: But very serious topic nevertheless
This post is a follow up to my earlier
post, same
subject here.
THIS FROM WASHINGTON (The
AP) — In a London bar three years ago, a young foreign policy adviser
for Trump's campaign, George
Papadopoulos, told an Australian diplomat something astonishing: “Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
Within
months, Papadopoulos, was proven right as stolen emails damaging to Clinton
surfaced online by WikiLeaks. Alarmed, Australian officials tipped off their
American counterparts.
For the FBI, the information was
worrisome:
1. How did Papadopoulos get advance word of the
emails?
2. Was he or
anyone else in the Trump campaign working with the Russians?
Those
questions led to the Mueller Russian investigation that would shadow Trump's
presidency for nearly two years.
Now Trump
and his supporters have seized on the FBI's use of informants in Papadopoulos'
case and surveillance of another campaign aide (Carter Page) to accuse the Justice Department and the FBI of
unlawfully “spying” on his campaign.
Article continues here with more details. I also
note these two key points:
1 – WAS ANY OF THIS ILLEGAL?
Based on
available public information, there's no evidence of illegal activity by the
FBI or the Justice Department. The FBI routinely uses informants, also known as
confidential sources, in a variety of investigations, from violent crimes to
white-collar and counterintelligence investigations.
The FISA
warrant the FBI obtained to monitor Page was lawfully obtained from a court in
October 2016.
A memo
released by House Republicans in 2018 showed that a judge agreed four times
that there was probable cause to believe Page was acting as an agent of a
foreign power. Top FBI and Justice Department officials, including Deputy AG, Rod Rosenstein, also signed
off on the FISA application.
2 – WHAT HAPPENS NOW?
AG Barr has said he's compiled a team to look
into the origins of the Russia investigation, a matter that is already being
investigated by the department's Inspector
General (IG).
In his
testimony during a congressional budget hearing last month, Barr said he
believes “spying” did occur on the campaign and suggested the origins of the
probe may have been mishandled.
Barr provided
no details about what “spying” may have taken place but appeared to be
referring to Carter Page. Barr has said he doesn't see the word as pejorative
and stopped short of saying anything unlawful or improper took place.
For his
part, Trump has repeatedly accused the government of committing an illegal,
unprecedented act. Senate Republicans have said they will also investigate the
origins of the Russia investigation.
My 2 cents: Not much to add to his very fine AP
rundown. Expect lots more from Trump as we move along the 2020 election timeline.
His nasty mean-spiritedness will intense with time, bet on it.
What we see is raw revenge yet SOP for Republicans
since the dawn of time and now Trump is singing that same tune.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment