Trump Tears Up Valuable Note: S/C Smith Has the Note that Finally Could Finish Off Trump

Smith has proof that shows Trump’s January 6 intent

If a former federal prosecutor is right, a torn-up note could be a key piece of evidence for special counsel Jack Smith in his case against Trump seen in this NEW REPUBLIC article headline:

“A Ripped-Up Note Could Help Jack Smith Take Down Donald Trump”

The note can prove Trump’s January 6 intent.

Background: In the weeks immediately preceding the January 6 insurrection, Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, claimed on Newsmax: “President Trump could take military capabilities and rerun an election in key swing states that he lost.”

The military shot down the idea when then-Army secretary Ryan McCarthy and then-Army Chief of Staff James McConville both said in a joint statement: “There’s no role for the military in determining the outcome of an American election.”

Shortly after the military made its stance known, Trump aide John McEntee wrote note to Trump, which could be the proof Smith needs to show Trump's intent: “Chris Miller (Acting Secretary of Defense) spoke to both of them and anticipates no more statements coming out. If another happens, he will fire them.”

Trump ripped up the note, which has since been reconstructed and was used as part of the House Committee’s January 6 investigation.

Trump in December tweeted a call to action from his supporters asking them to join him in D.C. on January 6 posting: “Big protest in D.C. on January 6. Be there, will be wild!”

That reconstructed note, collected as part of the House January 6 Committee’s investigation, and now appears in the pages of ABC News journalist Jonathan Karl’s latest book: “Tired of Winning: Donald Trump and the End of the Grand Old Party.”

Nicolle Wallace (MSNBC host) asked former DOJ official Andrew Weissmann: “Doesn’t that get right at his intent of what he wanted them to do?”

Weissmann said: “Absolutely” and then he concluded: “As much as you think of it as a military organization with a hierarchy, they are also trained that they do not violate the Constitution. And when there’s an invalid order, they know that they cannot follow it because the Constitution comes first.”

My 2 Cents: This update (Jonatan Karl's interview and his new book) seems pretty clear-cut to me…

It’s to finally nail Trump and get him out of the public limelight and help return us to some sort of normalcy – even if that’s humanly possible after all the destruction that Trump has levied on the country in a short period of time.

Thanks for stopping by.