Great motivational article for voting rights (this focus in
FL) and rightly so from an Editorial in the Palm Beach Post
with this headline:
“Voter suppression gets
deserved jolt in judge's ruling”
When Florida's Republican leaders scheme to
prevent Blacks from voting, that cannot be tolerated.
A good subject-related court
ruling in CO of GOP voter suppression stopped here from the Denver Post here.
Key part of the
Editorial: “We thank Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker for his
clear-eyed condemnation of the voter-suppressing measures that
Gov. Ron DeSantis and GOP lawmakers foisted on this state in this legislative
session and previous ones, with their feigned concern for fair elections.”
Judge Walker wrote in
his 288-page ruling on
March 31: “At some point, when the Florida Legislature passes law after law
disproportionately burdening Black voters, this court can no longer accept that
the effect is incidental. This court finds that, in the past 20 years, Florida
has repeatedly sought to make voting tougher for Black voters because of their
propensity to favor Democratic candidates. In summation, Florida has a
horrendous history of racial discrimination in voting.”
Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) immediately promised to appeal, and
that appeal would come before a conservative court comprised mostly of
jurists appointed by Republican presidents.
DeSantis has, after all, pushed hard to skew voting
districts and alter registration rules and drop box availability to stifle
Black votes and stir his base.
DeSantis has surpassed
ex-President Donald Trump's bigotry by enacting laws to hinder those calling for social equity —
and even the right to vote.
The student (DeSantis) has become the
master (Trump-like).
Walker's order, that for 10 years, FL must submit to
the court for prior clearance proposed changes to certain election laws leashes
a governor and legislative handmaidens who've removed from the right much
pretense of righteousness.
My 2 Cents: A bright light in a gloomy time – but now watch DeSantis try to take this all the way the U.S. Supreme Court.
That should prove most interesting in view of the fact that Section 4 of the VRA
has been under attack for some time since that court ruled on June 25, 2013 by
striking down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) the case known as Shelby
County (AL) v. Holder.
In that ruling, Chief
Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion in the 5-to-4
decision. The court found that the VRA's formula for deciding which
jurisdictions should be subject to preclearance is unconstitutional (SCOTUS blog
explains), because while the formula was rational in the 1960s, it's not
anymore. In other words, things are different in the South so stated Roberts
then – boy did he get it wrong as it applies.
But, let’s hope that if DeSantis gets this to the high court again events will convince them to get it right this time.
Hang on tight, it might get very ugly.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment