Monday, May 28, 2018

Trump-Russian Ties and Connections Well Known for Awhile: Depth, Width, Impact Growing

Vlad: I'm in deep shït here, can you help — 
anyway possible would be just fine



Amazing story from here about Trump and the Russian connection from early on.

A couple of key highlights:

From Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), who has led the minority on the House Intelligence Committee in its doomed investigative efforts over the last year to get to the bottom of Trump’s Kremlin ties had this to say: “There has been a systematic effort to stymie the committee by the GOP’s obstructionist and highly partisan – there is no evidence to support any “spy theory. This is just … a piece of propaganda the president wants to put out and repeat.”

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) now is equally blunt in his recent weekend TV show comments re: Trump’s latest “Spygate” illogic explained this way in an acid-etched interview: “I have not seen any evidence that the FBI spied on the Trump campaign. What I have seen is evidence that they were investigating individuals with a history of links to Russia that were concerning. It appears that there was an investigation not of the campaign, but of certain individuals who have a history that we should be suspicious of, that predate the presidential campaign of 2015, 2016. And when individuals like that are in the orbit of a major political campaign in America, the FBI, who is in charge of counterintelligence investigations, should look at people like that.”

Trump’s aggressive propaganda against any public airing of his secret Kremlin ties has taken many mendacious forms since his inauguration.

• In early 2017, the president claimed that he had been wiretapped. That lie which, coincidentally was not true and turned out to be of Russian origin also fell apart.

• Trump then tried out the accusation that members of his campaign had been improperly unmasked in top-secret intelligence documents. That was a lie likewise and it withered away under its own dishonesty.

• Now he and the White House insist that it was “spied” on illegally by the FBI. That too is a noxious myth and is slowly dying as well outside the feverish swamps of Trump bitter-enders — as it deserves to do.

My 2 cents: The whole story continues at the link above – it is for sure worth the time and effort to read and examine it – but the real question is simple and yet still complex: What now?

A lot is about to fall out from all this and hopefully come together in the Mueller final report to the DOJ and then logically they will pass it along to Congress at the same time reading it in a public address since.

The next move would be up the Congress – house first and hopefully the Senate for final decision – yes, I’m talking about articles of impeachment in the house and Senate trial and removal of Trump from office and the sooner the better for the country.

That process of course may or may not be up the all GOP-run House assuming two key things: (1) The GOP is not in control of Congress after the November mid-terms, and (2) Trump does not pull a Nixon and resign after he sees the handwriting on the wall about impeachment.

So, stay tuned.

Thanks for stropping by – the heat is on for sure.

No comments: