Hard to Tell the Diff Isn't It
Really Hard to Tell the Diff
Taxpayers Pay for Military Hardware
(DOD in turn gives a lot to Law Enforcement)
I have been wanting to write
on this subject for some time and this fine article gives me a lead in that
direction for this post – I hope you enjoy it as much as I have. It’s a good
topic for more discussion.
The
American Civil Liberties Union has released the results of its year-long study of police
militarization. The study looked at 800 deployments of SWAT teams among 20
local, state and federal police agencies in 2011-2012.
Among the notable findings
are these:
1. 62 percent of the SWAT raids surveyed were to
conduct searches for drugs.
2. Just under 80 percent were to serve a
search warrant, meaning eight in 10 SWAT raids were not initiated to apprehend
a school shooter, hostage taker, or escaped felon (the common justification for
these tactics), but to investigate someone still only suspected of committing a
crime.
3. In fact, just 7 percent of SWAT raids were
“for hostage, barricade, or active shooter scenarios.”
4. In at least 36 percent of the SWAT raids
studies, no contraband of any kind was found. The report notes that
due to incomplete police reports on these raids this figure could be as high as
65 percent.
5. 65 percent of SWAT deployments resulted in
some sort of forced entry into a private home, by way of a battering ram, boot,
or some sort of explosive device. In over half those raids, the police failed
to find any sort of weapon, the presence of which was cited as the reason for
the violent tactics.
6. Ironically (or perhaps not), searches to
serve warrants on people suspected of drug crimes were more likely to result in
forced entry than raids conducted for other purposes.
7. Though often justified for rare incidents
like school shootings or terrorist situations, the armored personnel vehicles
police departments are getting from the Pentagon and through grants from the
Department of Homeland Security are commonly used on drug raids.
8. SWAT tactics are disproportionately used
on people of color.
Continue
reading here (Washington Post) >>>
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment