Mar-a-Lago Documents: Increasing Damage With Simple Q: Where Are the TS/SCI Documents

Leaked Information is Threat to National Security

UPDATE BASED ON NEW HEADLINE:

Ego NOT Money (but consider more below) 

Various articles now imply that ego not money was motive as it relates to the classified documents stored and now missing from Mar-a-Lago. 

What about this: The now nearly $4 billion that Trump and Kushner got from the Saudis since they left the W/H including recently by Trump himself?

A lot speculation still whirls around this still-open case – a lot of info if unknown precisely like I asked before: Where are the TS/SCI documents, Mr. Trump and Mr. Kushner? And, did you two use them to get money from the Saudis? We need to know and ASAP would be better.

References to the Saudi money deals:

Here from the Daily Mail with this recent story headline: “The Trump family signs deal with Saudi real estate developer behind $1.6 BILLION property project.”

Here from NEWSWEEK vis-à-vis Kushner’s $2 BILLION deal and this Mary Trump story input here also linked to various quotes from the story: “Jared Kushner Theories Swirl Over $2B Saudi Money After Trump Mole Claims.”

ORIGINAL POST FROM HERE:

Startling and routine legal ploy by Trump vis-à-vis the missing classified documents at Mar-a-Lago reported on here from the Washington Examiner with this headline:

“Trump admits taking sensitive documents from White House to Mar-a-Lago in new filings”

Trump has admitted that he took reams of records from the White House to Mar-a-Lago but he argues that the records were designated as personal records by him rather than remaining presidential records.

Trump’s attorneys contend that under the Presidential Records Act: “A President determines whether a document constitutes a Presidential record or a personal record, and that when that decision is made, it is not subject to challenge. There is no authority whatsoever for the notion that the Government can seize documents from a President, and simply declare that they are Presidential records.”

They continued: “President Trump was still serving his term in office when the documents at issue were packed, transported, and delivered to his residence in Palm Beach. Thus, when he made a designation decision, he was President of the United States; his decision to retain certain records as personal is entitled to deference, and the records in question are thus presumptively personal.”

Related to this New Report:

Key factor in AG Garland’s decision on whether or not to charge Trump with short video.

My 2 Cents: The Washington Post reported that longtime federal prosecutor David Raskin is assisting the DOJ Mar-a-Lago case. Noteworthy: Raskin helped obtain a guilty plea from former FBI analyst Kendra Kingsbury, who pleaded guilty in October to two counts of unlawful removal and holding of 386 National Security classified records in her home in Kansas City, MO.

The graph and articles all now clearly show that Trump’s criminal act is probably far worse than Kingsbury’s cited above, but we have to see how this latest legal ploy and stunt – for surely it is a delaying tactical stunt – by Trump and his legal team plays out, so stay tuned.

My earlier Mar-a-Lago posts here, here, and here.

Thanks for stopping by.