Trump and GOP Both Hate the CFPB
(Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)
(Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)
Background
here from Fortune before the main
post:
Within
days of being sworn in, President Donald Trump has already pledged to cut
business regulations by 75%. One way he is likely to fulfill that
promise, at least in part, is by defanging a legacy of the 2008 financial
crisis: the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau (CFPB).
Note: The agency has been praised by Democrats and consumer advocates for
cracking down on abuses by financial firms, recall for example: It was a key player in the $185-million settlement Wells
Fargo & Co. agreed to pay last year for the creation of as many as 2
million accounts without customer authorization.
In a somewhat similar case,
the CFPB accused PayPal of signing consumers up for credit lines they
had not asked for. PayPal (also
from Fortune) was ordered to pay consumers $15 million, and was fined $10
million. Such a step would mean the functional end to the consumer watchdog,
which has been responsible for returning roughly $11.8 billion to some 29
million consumers since its inception in 2011. That's an average of $407
returned to each affected consumer, affecting roughly 9% of the U.S. population
(assuming no single consumer was a victim in more than one case).
It
was important that independent federal agencies not get “mired in partisan
politics and added: The new administration really shouldn’t change the job at
all. We’re expected to work with different administrations of different points
of view. We have … an independent mandate to do what we do and we will
continue working to protect consumers.”
CFPB Accomplishments since it was formed partly in response to reports of deceptive
mortgage lending practices that helped precipitate the housing crash of 2008.
1. It is designed to safeguard
consumers in their dealings with the financial-services industry. They have
been very effective in moves to curb abuses in the payday, student, and auto lending industries.
2. The agency has also focused
on predatory lending practices that target low-income consumers that can ill
afford their loans.
3. Currently, the bureau is
funded by the Federal Reserve, and therefore doesn't report to elected leaders
and does not use taxpayers’ money.
Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) and Sen. Mike
Lee (R-UT) called for replacing the current director (Richard Cordray) of the independent bureau with a multi-member
panel that can be controlled by Congress. Trump wants Director Cordray out — even
if the legality of firing the independent director is still up in the air (Politico
report).
Rational Question: Can Trump fire the head of the independent consumer
bureau, which was created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank
financial regulatory overhaul, is the subject of an ongoing legal
dispute. Cordray’s five-year term doesn’t expire until July 2018, and an agency
spokeswoman has said he has no plans to step down.
This
month, two Republican senators called on Trump to fire Cordray,
echoing the views of many GOP lawmakers who believe the agency’s efforts have
restricted lending and reduced consumers’ choices.
Asked
Monday if Trump was going to shake up the bureau’s leadership before Cordray’s
term expires next year, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said “no decision has been made at this time on that.”
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) and 37 other members of the Congressional Black
Caucus wrote to Trump on Tuesday saying they “would strongly oppose any attempt
to remove Cordray” and “would view such an action as an illegitimate abuse of
power,” then adding: “Director Cordray has done nothing to give the necessary
cause for his removal from office. Communities of color and, indeed, all
consumers in America will benefit from having director Cordray remain in his
position and continue to independently implement the mandates imposed upon him
by Congress as the director of the CFPB.”
Trump
further has said he wants to dismantle Dodd-Frank and seeks Legislation from
House Financial Services Committee [Chairman Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX)] to overhaul the law and rename the
bureau the Consumer Financial Opportunity Commission (CFOC), to replace the
single director (Mr. Cordray) with five commissioners and subject its budget to
congressional appropriations and thus congressional oversight, which takes away
the “independent” aspect.
(I note: That if this were to happen, politics and haggling
would be the rule of the day other than helping protect American consumers –
which this goal, isn’t it?)
Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) and Sen. Mike
Lee (R-UT) based their firing request on an October federal appeals
court ruling that the consumer bureau’s structure is unconstitutional because
it gives the director too much power.
The
say and seem to imply that under Dodd-Frank, the director serves a five-year
term and can be removed only “for cause,” such as neglect of duty, supported by
a 2-1 ruling from a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for DC that said
in part that structure violated the Constitution’s separation of powers because
it limited the president’s authority. Further, that court said the solution to
strike down the law’s “for cause provision, means the president can remove the CFPB
director for any reason, the same as with other executive branch appointees”
The
CFPB is appealing that ruling, asking all of the court’s judges to review it. Some
legal scholars said the legal challenge could present problems for Trump if he
wants to remove Cordray.
Who is Richard Cordray? His is a lawyer and former Ohio AG
general, wouldn’t say Tuesday whether he would fight an attempt by Trump
to fire him, and he wouldn’t provide his own legal opinion of whether the
president had that authority.
Cordray says: “I was nominated and then confirmed by the Senate to
serve a term. All the independent federal regulatory agencies have terms that
overlap one administration or another. That’s meant to preserve their
independence. That’s important because without the independence you end up
mired in partisan politics, the big-money special interests … will try to
dictate results.”
So,
what does all this mean? Simple, to reinforce the power base for Mr. Trump and the
GOP who in turn can say, “See what are doing for you? Now reelect us again.”
I say, for us, we, or even me? Ha, ha — what joke...!!!
The
CFPB has done more to help consumers than any hypocritical all GOP-run
Congress. This action if carried out is unwarranted and I know 100% will be
very unpopular (except for the GOP that is). Time will tell. Stay tuned.
No comments:
Post a Comment