Proposed New GOP Logo
Words of Wisdom
(GOP apparently never knew or has forgotten)
Always Easy GOP Target
(The innocent, helpless, and needy)
War on Women is Real
(GOP in Self-Denial)
Science Deniers
(GOP trademark)
Introduction to this long post (sorry): Ponder this question: What if the GOP didn't have a
range of these issues to wheel and deal from?
- “Cut taxes” (give trickle
down a chance);
- “Reduce size of government”
(except for what we want bigger);
- “Stop or prevent a woman from
choosing her own health-care (repeal ACA);
- “Keep MIC and gun makers
well-funded” (with open door access to us);
- “Get Rid of Unions and their
money” (but keep big corporate money);
- “Insist on voter ID laws” (we
need to ensure our party wins all the time);
- “Eliminate public employees
and their Unions” (the market is our king);
- “Shit can all public
assistance programs” (tell our base it's for their own good).
Etc., etc., etc.
Without those issues and a
few other harsh policy goals there would be no more GOP, either that or just
roll the dice and elect Trump to reinforce those items with the help of Speaker
Paul “Marathon” Ryan, who seems to push them, he being the budget guru everyone
thinks he is. Then consider this laundry list and background:
Ever since the GOP took total control of Congress following
the 2014 election, this is what we have seen happen or attempted:
1. Without relying on tax increases, budget
writers were forced into contortions to bring the budget into balance while
placating defense hawks clamoring for increased military spending.
2. They added nearly $40 billion in “emergency”
war funding to the defense budget for next year, raising military spending
without technically breaking strict caps imposed by the 2011 Budget Control Act.
3. The plan contains more than $1 trillion in
savings from unspecified cuts to programs like food stamps and welfare.
4. Demands the full repeal of the Affordable
Care Act (Obama-care), including the tax increases that finance the health care
law.
5. Keeps the same level of federal revenue over
the next 10 years that the CBO foresees with those tax increases in place —
essentially counting $1 trillion of taxes that the same budget swears to forgo.
6. Does not cut popular Pell Grants for higher
education instead “makes the Pell Grant program permanently sustainable.”
7. Cuts spending on Medicaid below $913 billion
over a decade once the health program is turned to block grants to the states,
as they say: “Our budget realigns the relationship the federal government has
with states and local communities by respecting and restoring the principle of
federalism.”
8. Cuts billions from the SNAP (food stamp
program).
9. Many domestic programs would be cut $519
billion below the already restrictive caps set in 2011.
10. The White House estimates that between the
Affordable Care Act repeal and the cuts to Medicaid alone, some 37 million
people would lose health insurance that they now have under the ACA.
Now, consider this: the three
basic things all humans need to live are: clean safe water; safe healthy food;
and clean healthy air – all under attack by the GOP.
Several Examples:
• Funding for EPA’s landmark
Clean Power Plan (for cleaner air) would be blocked under a $30.2 billion
GOP-sponsored bill in the House. The agency would not be able to use any
government funding to propose, finalize, implement or enforce the regulation,
which was first unveiled in June 2014. The proposed rule, which is the main
pillar of Obama’s climate change agenda, requires power plants nationwide to
cut their carbon emissions by 30 percent by 2030. The final version of the
regulation is due out in August. The EPA is also expected to outline how they
would ensure states comply with the rules if they refuse to craft their own
plans to cut power plant emissions.
The White House warned in a veto threat of
the House bill last week that the rider would place the country “at risk from
extreme weather events, wildland fire, poor air quality, global instability,
accelerated environmental degradation, and illnesses transmitted by food,
water, and disease carriers such as mosquitoes and ticks.
A hearty contrast in play dating
back to the Newt Gingrich big win and GOP takeover of Congress in 1995): The
GOP message in their fervor to attack “big government, lower taxes, and less
regulation has pretty much been like Déjà vu all over again (as Yogi Berra
would say) with Republicans gutting some of our most important social safety
net of all time, like:
1. Plans to deny AFDC benefits to children born
to single women younger than 18 will push millions off welfare rolls, with no
alternative in sight.
2. Some are “sacred cows for too long.” For
example: agencies such as HUD or quasi-government organizations such as Amtrak.
3. One particularly fat sacred cow that might
now bite the dust is farm subsidies.
For example, in 1994 the
government paid farmers, large and small, some $10 billion to prop up the price
of their goods. That benefited a special interest group while sticking it to
consumers in two ways: You paid more for goods such as bread, cereal, and milk,
and your taxes were higher than they needed to be.
Another example regards school lunches: The Obama administration became more involved in what
Americans put on their dinner plates and in their cereal bowls, and requiring
school children to be served fruit to eliminating Trans fats in doughnuts.
This new Republican Congress
already laid the groundwork to push back in 2015. This GOP in short wants to take
on school nutrition in a big way and with harsh methods to boot.
The $1.1 trillion omnibus
this month included provisions to allow states more flexibility to exempt
schools from the Department of Agriculture’s whole-grain standards if they can show hardship and to halt future
sodium restrictions.
Wow, GOP wants to see the
hardship in reducing sodium and salt? Wow…
Also this interesting twist: GOP wants more FDA
involvement in food labeling:
1. The labeling issue is not the only one the FDA
could play defense on next year.
2. The FDA can expect continued push back from
the food industry on its Nutrition Facts Panel proposal, which would require
manufacturers to separately list added sugars. Interest groups have been taking
their concerns about what they see as a flagrant bureaucratic overreach to
Capitol Hill for months, though it’s not yet clear how a Republican majority
might address the issue.
3. Still another issue that could be a wild card
for the FDA later in the year is salt (as mentioned above).
The agency is working on a
policy to further reduce sodium in the food supply, but many are in the dark
about the project’s status. The issue, which the food industry would quickly
attack, is assumed to be on the agency’s back burner for now.
4. More on the labeling issue: Congress can be
expected to debate the need for requiring manufacturers to say when their foods
contain genetically modified ingredients (GMO). Following Vermont’s passage of
a GMO labeling requirement and several close votes on ballot initiatives, Rep.
Mike Pompeo (R-KS) said he plans to reintroduce a food industry-supported bill
early in 2015 that would prevent states
from setting their own standards and guaranteeing the authority to label GMOs
stays squarely with FDA. The FDA has expressed little interest in making
labeling mandatory.
Two examples the radical, very radical practices of this
GOP:
• Rep. Cathy McMorris-Rodgers
(R-WA) took aim at the FDA’s menu labeling rules earlier this month, saying the
measures are “suffocating America’s economy.” She calls for the passage of the Common Sense
Nutrition Disclosure Act, HR 1249, a bill she introduced in March 2013 that
would roll back some of the administration’s new rules.
• Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) is expected to push a
companion Senate version next year as well.
Thanks for stopping by as usual in this extremely unusual election cycle - maybe the most unusual in modern races.
