Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Our Troops Take Care Over Us — Who Takes Care of Them

Cuts are Coming and Coming Hard, Harsh, Haphazardly, Heated 


Great reflection introduces for this topic. It comes from MSNBC on Ike's clear warning:



Background to this topic:


Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel has some tough decisions to make very soon to “downsize the military” across the board that fall under the overall DOD budget. The cuts and reductions will not be pretty. They are in part thanks the inaction (and some actions) by and pressures from this “Do as little as possible Congress.” You know the one I mean: The “We are the Patriot’s Club Members.” However, I suggest they all sit down and review this post and contents before blessing any harsh cuts in DOD:

DATE LINE January 17, 1961 -

In his farewell address to the nation, President Dwight D. Eisenhower warns the American people to keep a careful eye on what he called the “Military-Industrial Complex” that was developed in the post-World War II years and is extremely strong today, I might add.

A fiscal conservative, Eisenhower had been concerned about the growing size and cost of the American defense establishment since he became president in 1953. In his last presidential address to the American people, he expressed those concerns in terms that frankly shocked some of his listeners.

Eisenhower began by describing the changing nature of the American defense establishment since World War II. No longer could the U.S. afford the “emergency improvisation” that characterized its preparations for war against Germany and Japan. Instead, the United States was “compelled to create a permanent armaments industry” and a huge military force. He admitted that the Cold War made clear the “imperative need for this development,” but he was gravely concerned about “the acquisition of unwarranted influence ... by the military-industrial complex.” In particular, he asked the American people to guard against the “danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

Eisenhower's blunt language stunned some of his supporters. They believed that the man who led the country to victory in Europe in World War II and guided the nation through some of the darkest moments of the Cold War was too negative toward the military-industrial complex that was the backbone of America's defense.

For most listeners, however, it seemed clear that Eisenhower was merely stating the obvious. World War II and the ensuing Cold War resulted in the development of a large and powerful defense establishment. Necessary though that development might be, President Eisenhower warned, this new military-industrial complex could weaken or destroy the very institutions and principles it was designed to protect.

Related stories on this topic are found here and here.

No comments: