Political Rapids & Current Events: Foreign and Domestic
“You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.” — Abraham Lincoln
Sunday, February 23, 2025
Conspiracy theory spreading: Social media say Musk's Starlink interfered with 2024 election
Monday, February 3, 2025
Trump & Musk Are Out of Control: For our survival they have to be and must be stopped
First, this shocking FORTUNE
story about Elon Musk and his illegal access to classified, sensitive, and
personal information with this headline:
“Musk’s DOGE gets access to classified USAID info after
security chiefs tried to block move – then were put on leave, officials say”
The disgusting, evil, and nasty Elon Musk must be prosecuted – he has no security clearance, no security access to classified, or sensitive personal information or data, and had no reason to gain the information, and he even is not a valid nor legal government official. Trump and Musk have effectively found a backdoor way to seize Congress’s power to appropriate funds for the executive branch — a move that would make it easier to cut the budget but also challenge basic democratic norms.
Don Moynihan, a public policy professor at
the University of Michigan said: “If Musk can single-handedly shut off spending
for one government agency, he can do it for any another. He can shut off
payment of federal employee salaries. He can shut down federal contracts. It is
an extraordinary abuse of public power.”
------------------------------------------------------------
Then this second shocking story from AP News relates to the above article and current Trump & Musk craziness:
“Elon Musk’s DOGE commission gains access to sensitive
Treasury payment systems”
WASHINGTON — The DOGE run by Trump’s billionaire adviser and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, has gained access to sensitive Treasury data including Social Security, and Medicare customer payment systems, according to two people familiar with the situation.
The move
by DOGE, a Trump administration task force assigned to find ways to fire
federal workers, cut programs and slash federal regulations, means it could
have wide leeway to access important taxpayer data, among other things.
NOTED: The New York Times first reported the
news of the group’s access of the massive federal payment system. The two
people who spoke to the AP spoke on condition of anonymity because they were
not authorized to speak publicly.
The ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, Sen. Ron Wyden
(R-OR) sent a letter to Trump’s Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressing
concern: “That officials associated
with Musk may have intended to access these payment systems to illegally
withhold payments to any number of programs. To put it bluntly, these payment
systems simply cannot fail, and any politically motivated meddling in them
risks severe damage to our country and the economy.”
The news also comes after Treasury’s acting Deputy Secretary David Lebryk resigned after more than 30 years of service. Lebryk resigned his position after Musk and his DOGE organization requested access to sensitive Treasury data.
In his letter to the
employees he said: “Our service
performs some of the most vital functions in government. Our work may be unknown
to most of the public, but doesn’t mean it isn’t exceptionally important. I am
grateful for having been able to work alongside the nation’s best and most
talented operations staff.”
Musk responded to the departure of Lebryk on his X page saying: “The DOGE team discovered, among other things, that payment approval officers at Treasury were instructed always to approve payments, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups. They literally never denied a payment in their entire career. Not even once.”
NOTED: Musk DID NOT provide proof of that claim. I
suppose he is covered by what Trump labeled him based on this story:
Trump makes Elon Musk
a “Special Government Employee” amid accusations of takeover.
My 2 Cents: These articles and the Trump-Musk moves are illegal and
unlawful.
Lots of legal
cases are forthcoming to nail them both. We need to stop them and stop them
now.
The nation’s
future is at stake and many lives, too. I fear the worst is yet to come.
Thanks for
stopping by.
Monday, January 27, 2025
Battle of AI Giants: China’s New “DeepSeek” vs. “U.S. Nvidia” Winner TBA
“Don’t Fight DeepSeek Learn From It”
Some of these
concerns appear overblown. The real issue is China’s challenge to U.S.
technology leadership posed by rapid advancements in advanced
industries including artificial intelligence, semiconductors, robotics,
fintech, and electric vehicles.
Instead of blaming China for its attempt to lead in some key
technologies, the West should learn from China’s desire and capability to
pivot. These insights would help the U.S. decide whether to compete against
China or to cooperate with China in advanced technologies.
For decades, China was perceived primarily as the world’s factory, a place where low-cost manufacturing thrived. Recent years have shifted this perception dramatically. The U.S. and other Western nations have begun to recognize China’s burgeoning role as a hub of innovation. This transformation is evident in the rise of Chinese tech giants, advancements in various high-tech industries, and the increasing global influence of Chinese innovations.
The West’s apprehension about China’s rise as an innovation
powerhouse is recent. Historically, there was a belief that China couldn’t innovate because its economic
model was controlled by the state, and that was thought to impede innovation. The
West was slow to understand that China has long desired to shift from “Made in China” (with cheap labor) to “Innovate
in China” (with scientific talent).
China invented paper and fireworks in ancient times, but in
recent history — since its economic reforms in 1979 — it has emphasized
innovation by improving or applying existing ideas learned from the West (U.S.
mostly). China’s approach to innovation
includes: (1) strong government backing, and (2) focus on practical
applications.
That propelled China to remarkable innovations in several fields:
First, China has
redefined internet and mobile phone applications. The rise of platforms such as Alibaba’s Alipay
and Tencent’s Alipay’s WeChat, and Tencent’s Alipay that has
transformed how people interact, shop, and conduct business online,
revolutionizing mobile payments and social media, respectively. These
innovations have set new standards globally and demonstrated
China’s ability to lead in digital technology.
Second, China’s
innovative prowess in EVs has taken the world by surprise. Two prominent
examples are CATL’s battery technology and BYD’s EV manufacturing. Elon Musk
laughed at the poor design and quality of China’s BYD cars in 2011,
but in 2023 he admitted that
BYD is now a competitor of Tesla’s after BYD became dominant in the EV
market. With over 110,000 R&D engineers, BYD obtained 538 new patent authorizations in just the
first two weeks of January, an increase of 216% over the same period last year.
Third, in
telecommunications technology, Huawei’s significant advancements in the development and
deployment of fifth-generation networks have prompted concerns and bans in the
U.S. driven by national security. Nonetheless, Huawei remains a major competitor in the global telecom
sector, competing with other industry giants like Samsung, Apple,
and Ericsson.
Fourth, China has
poured enormous resources into AI development, resulting in groundbreaking
advancements in natural language processing, autonomous systems, and algorithm-driven manufacturing. It isn’t just
DeepSeek. China’s rapid development in AI is squeezing the U.S.-led
semiconductor ecosystem.
Fifth, China’s
advancements in robotics and autonomous driving further illustrate its
innovative capabilities.
The country is ahead of the U.S. in some areas of autonomous driving and
robotics, driven by significant investments and a favorable regulatory
environment. These developments are reshaping industries and positioning China
as a global leader in these fields.
Despite U.S. export controls on 24 types of chip-making
equipment and three categories of software essential for semiconductor
development, AI has the potential to help China develop its advanced
semiconductor capabilities.
The U.S. has often accused China of technology theft, but China’s
innovation
advantage lies in its ability to combine rapid technological development
with a supportive ecosystem.
These factors created the major forces driving their innovations:
1. First, its vast human capital, with a large pool of
STEM graduates, provides a strong foundation for technological advancement.
2. Second, China’s culture
of hard work and perseverance fosters an environment conducive to innovation.
3. Third, substantial government support through policies and funding has been instrumental in driving research research and development.
4. Finally,
China’s economic heft, with the world’s second-largest domestic market, allows
for the rapid scaling of new technologies. The West’s reaction to China’s
innovation highlights a sense of hypocrisy and insecurity. Initially, China was
criticized for not innovating enough. As China emerges as a leading innovator,
the West accuses it of stealing technology and imposes various bans out of fear.
Instead of using export
controls to panicky response to block China’s desire to innovate, it would be more
constructive to learn more about China’s innovation ecosystem to advance
humanity as this old Chinese proverb says: “Understanding yourself first and then your opponent’s is the best way
to ensure your success.”
Related headline article from FORTUNE: Chinese AI “DeepSeek”
threatening American AI “Nvidia” for AI dominance.
My 2 Cents: I have spoken awhile about the good, the bad, and the
ugly of AI. The above article takes a totally different view of how to compete
rather than overtake China’s AI growth on a world scale.
Article Intelligence (AI), the science and
engineering of making intelligent machines, combines algorithms (unambiguous
instructions) with data to perform functions similar to human decision-making.
*
The first generation of AI, in the 1980’s and 1990’s, could apply rules written
by humans to data to create outputs.
*
The second generation of AI, in the 2000’s, could learn, meaning that programs
could take data and guidance provided by humans, independently identify rules,
and then apply those rules to new data to create outputs.
* Now, the third
generation of AI, which we are currently in, seeks to incorporate “deep learning.”
Deep learning
permits programs to autonomously learn rules and automatically judge new data
to create outputs, without human intervention. AI offers pros and cons like
anything new on the world stage for example as explained above and in this fine article here with this introductory question: “Artificial
intelligence prevents us from being inundated with irrelevant information – and
that raises an important question: “Who
determines what is relevant or irrelevant? And how do they
decide?”
A lot of info on this
topic is growing faster than the AI field of innovation as out above – again,
the good, the bad, and the ugly.
I am not an expert by any
means on this subject – only from what I read and hear and watch about AI and its
growth and purpose and benefits.
Quite frankly it scares me
the most in the bad and ugly parts not the good for good is supposed to be good
as they say for everything and everyone.
But, as the question above asks I also ask: “Who determines the good over the bad and the ugly.” Or as also stated above: “What is relevant and irrelevant and who determines?”
Thanks for stopping by.
Saturday, January 25, 2025
Trump Vis-á-Vis Kim Jong-un: Praises Kim While Taking Swiping at Obama & Biden
Trump has gone off the deep end of the reality standard after
only a few days back in power – this THE INDEPENDENT article headline cites one key example and pretty
much says it all:
“Trump describes North
Korea leader Kim Jong-Un in two words as he takes swipe at Obama and Biden”
Trump described Kim as a “smart guy” during
an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News on
Thursday (23 January), saying: “He’s not
a religious zealot. He happens to be a smart guy. Kim Jong-Un is a smart
guy.”
Trump repeated his good relations with the North Korean leader even as ties between Washington and Pyongyang deteriorated underJoe Biden’s administration.
My 2 Cents: If there are two areas of the world that I know well and have studied for years including 47 weeks studying their languages while I was an interrogator in the Marine Corps, they are North Korea and Russia, plus I served in Korea for nearly 12 years.
I do agree with Trump when he says that Kim, Jong-un is “a smart guy” true but only smart in an ugly and evil way in his methods and goals, just like Putin.
Kim, Jong-un even had his half-brother, Kim Jong-nam assassinated on February 13, 2017.
Kim Jong-nam died after being exposed to VX nerve agent at Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Malaysia.
It is widely believed that he was killed on the orders of his half-brother. Four North Korean suspects left the airport shortly after the attack, traveling back to Pyongyang.
Plus, Kim, Jong-un had his once-powerful uncle, Chang, Song-taek executed after being purged for “acts of treachery” in 2013.
Kim and Putin both know Trump well and what precisely what makes him tick, too.
They both play Trump a fiddle to get his kudos and what they want from him, and it seems to work, too, e.g., North Korean troops now helping Putin in his war against Ukraine, and Trump doesn't seem to mind much, but he said he will look into the matter as reported on here.
Thanks for stopping by.
Monday, January 20, 2025
Two of Six Billionaires: In Deep For & With Trump Are Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg
From the WASHINGTON EXAMINER with an interesting story and catchy headline that is direct line to and from pleasing Trump and vice versa as he enters office again:
“Big Tech favored with
better seats than Cabinet nominees at Trump’s inauguration”
To set the scene click
here for reporter video.
Elon Musk has emerged as a top Trump ally since vigorously
campaigning for the president last fall and subsequently being appointed to
lead the new Department of Government
Efficiency (DOGE), and of course dropping some $250M to help Trump win the
election.
Mark Zuckerberg recently rolled back diversity, equity, and
inclusion (DEI) policies at Meta, a key priority for Trump during the campaign.
The Zuck also rescinded controversial fact-checking
policies, which critics had argued were biased against Trump and other
Republicans.
All of the tech gurus have flocked to meet with Trump at
Mar-a-Lago, the Trump Florida home since he won, as they say “to kiss the ring”
some other body part to get in his
good graces – and apparently it is working.
My 2 Cents: Elon Musk is more than all that mentioned above and in spades as they expression says.
He is in fact acting as Trump’s
“Co-President” and make no mistake about that fact.
Trump listens to Musk and explicitly
hears Ka-Ching, Ka-Ching the sound that reverberates back from Musk.
More will follow on this subject as we move a long in Trump 20 – bet on.
Thanks for stopping by.
Sunday, January 19, 2025
Israel-Hamas Update: Three Women Released & Cross Back into Israel Custody
From NBC News on the Gaza
Hostage Release: An NBC News crew in Gaza witnessed the handover to the Red
Cross, which then transferred three women to the Israeli military.
Video updates (click here) offer details thus far:
What we know:
Ø The three women hostages released taken during
the October 7 Hamas terror attack are: Romi Gonen, Emily Damari, and Doron Steinbrecher.
Ø The three women taken hostage by Hamas have
crossed into Israel as part of a long-awaited ceasefire deal that came after 15 months
of near-constant war in Gaza.
Ø It appears that the ceasefire is holding.
Ø Palestinian families are returning to Rafah,
mostly on foot.
Ø Under the terms of the complex three-phase deal,
four additional living hostages are expected to be released in seven days.
Ø
About 90 Palestinians in Israeli prison and
detention are expected to be released.
Some 46,800 Palestinians have been killed in the fighting.
More than 1,200 Israelis were killed on October 7, 2023, and during
military operations.
My 2 Cents: Good news – the plans seems to be working and let’s hope it sticks.
As noted with the brief from President Biden it does seem to be on schedule as agreed upon.
Now as noted in the quote from Trump above he has to be front and center as usual in anything good while blasting other painting them as awful.
He is a pitiful human
being; truly a disgrace with no dignity at all, only for himself.
Thanks for stopping by.
Thursday, January 16, 2025
Musk. Ramaswamy & 10 Other Billionaires: President Biden Warns of Oligarchy in Trump 2.0
Amazing
article from MARKET WATCH (Barron’s) is pretty
startling and right in line with Joe Biden’s remarks about the superrich taking
over the Trump administration with this headline:
“Trump’s
Team is stocked with billionaires. Why the Super Rich are taking over
Washington”
President-elect Donald Trump is adding ultra-wealthy people to his
administration to reward their loyalty and to shake up the agencies they are
about to lead.
This headline article also from MARKET WATCH is:
“Biden
warns that an oligarchy is taking hold in America. There is data to back him up”
Wealth disparity in the U.S. has grown since 2009, according to Fed
data, with a significant increase in the share of the nation’s wealth held by
the 238,000 richest people
Trump’s
administration is shaping up to be filled with super wealthy individuals, many
of whom could directly benefit from being close to the center of
power.
Billionaire
Elon Musk is spearheading a new advisory unit (DOGE) aimed at cutting
government waste alongside biotech billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy, and there are
at least 10 other billionaires nominated to top roles. At least six others have a net worth of $150
million or more
* Billionaire
Howard Lutnick, investment firm CEO Cantor Fitzgerald, was nominated as
commerce secretary.
* Multimillionaire
Scott Bessent, Founder of the investment firm Key Square Capital Management,
was nominated to lead Treasury.
* Liberty
Energy CEO Chris Wright, net worth of about $170 million, according to
Bloomberg, may head the energy department.
If
confirmed, these and other super wealthy people — many without government
experience or a working understanding of the departments they may oversee — will
hold considerable sway over public policy. In return, they, either individually
or through their business interests, could potentially benefit from policies
and regulations they oversee.
President Biden raised alarm over the level of wealth held by members
of Trump’s incoming team in his farewell address from the Oval Office drawing attention
to the potential influence of tech entrepreneurs saying: “Today, an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power
and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights
and freedoms and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead.”
One
reason Trump is nominating rich people is to reward their loyalty — Wright, for instance, is among vocal
domestic oil-and-gas industry supporters — but it’s also because
they can shake up the agencies they are about to lead.
For example, in a statement made after nominating North Dakota Gov. Doug
Burgum to lead the interior department Trump said he would chair a National
Energy Council that would:
“Oversee the path to U.S. ENERGY
DOMINANCE by cutting red tape, enhancing private sector investments across all
sectors of the Economy, and by focusing on INNOVATION over longstanding, but
totally unnecessary, regulation.”
Donald Sherman, Chief Counsel
for (CREW) said:
“Hiring billionaires and others with vast
financial entanglements” is ensuring they abide by federal conflict of interest
statutes. That has a tangible impact on whether the government is prioritizing
the interests of the American public, or for everyday people who voted for, or
didn’t vote for Trump. Or that versus the narrow financial interests of the
individuals who are running these agencies.”
Brian Hughes, a spokesman for
the transition of Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance, said: “All nominees and appointees will comply with the ethical obligations of
their respective agencies.”
As an
advisor, Musk doesn’t have to comply with the federal criminal conflict of
interest statute, so he doesn’t need to sell shares in his companies. That
billionaires and other wealthy folks — including mega donors —are filling the
ranks of top government jobs in the U.S. is unsurprising to Krcmaric and other
authors of a Northwestern University study titled “Billionaire Politicians: A Global Perspective,” published in
June.
According
to their research, 11.7% of about 2,000 billionaires tracked by Forbes “held or sought political office through
about the middle of 2023.”
That is particularly true in autocracies such as China and
Russia where the rich are motivated to enter politics to protect their wealth,
the authors said.
The statistics back it up: 36.4% of Chinese billionaires,
and 21.3% of Russian billionaires held or sought political office through the
summer of 2023.
In the
U.S. and other democracies, the wealthy had typically achieved similar goals
through big, anonymous donations. Only 3.7% of U.S. billionaires sought or held
office in the period studied for the paper.
Stephen Nelson, associate
professor of political science at Northwestern said: “We don’t have data right now to suggest out of the total pool of
billionaires how many are currently serving in politics Trump’s incoming team seems
to be skewed more heavily toward ultra-rich people, which suggests the U.S. is
moving in a particular direction.”
Richard Painter, a professor of
corporate law at the University of MN an Ethics lawyer for President George W.
Bush from 2005-07 said:
“Billionaires often have had roles
in previous U.S. administrations. The super wealthy don’t take these jobs for the money, but for the
opportunity to participate in government and take on a new challenge, Painter
told Barron’s. They also get a tax benefit,” he said. Although
government officials must sell holdings that may pose a conflict of interest,
they often don’t have to pay capital-gains taxes on these ethics-related sales
if they are issued a “certificate of divestiture” from the Office of Government
Ethics and invest the proceeds from the sale in Treasuries or a
government-approved diversified fund. Having to sell a concentrated, long-held
investment can benefit someone who has been hesitant to diversify their
holdings because of embedded capital gains. There’s also the broader, and
again, non-legal question, of how a government of super wealthy individuals
serves a public that isn’t nearly that rich. It’s a lot of billionaires coming
in to solve the problems of the working people. We’ll see how that works out.”
Whether
the individuals selected for government roles have legal conflicts of interests
with their jobs will be revealed when financial disclosure forms are filed and
made available to the public. But even then, the extensive financial footprint
of the richest nominees will make it challenging to learn all the potential
conflicts that could touch the work they do and the sectors they oversee.
The roles that Wright, Bessent, Lutnick, and others may soon play also extends
beyond legal conflict of interest questions to the appearance of a conflict.
Sherman also said about Wright: “It’s certainly reasonable for the American public to question the
appointment of someone who is heavily invested in one part of the energy
sector, being appointed to a role where they are meant to oversee the entirety
of the energy sector. It’s like a cafeteria run by somebody who owns a candy
shop.”
My 2
Cents: President
Biden stated the obvious and the above article reinforces his statement – proof
meets pudding.
Elon Musk and dozen others in the White House inner circle which
is pitiful to say least about him and his goals for Trump with and I might not
a drop of legal authority for the DOGE crazy scheme and nonsense.
But we shall see as time goes by and thus far it has not been pretty in fact based on the above info it’s worse and apt to get worse.
Thanks for stopping by.
Friday, January 10, 2025
Trump Pie in the Sky: GOP Willing to Help With His Metaphorical Carrots on a Very Big Stick
Catchy article with this short video that explains the issue:
The NEWS
NATION story headline:
“House Republican bill would pave way for Trump to acquire Panama Canal
for U.S.”
Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD) introduces a bill that would
authorize the president to purchase the Panama Canal and put it under U.S.
control, an acquisition that Trump has been pushing over the last several
weeks.
Johnson plans to
introduce the Panama Canal Repurchase Act, saying in a press statement: “President
Trump is right to consider repurchasing the Panama Canal. China’s interest in
and presence around the canal is a cause for concern. America must project
strength abroad – owning and operating the Panama Canal might be an important
step towards a stronger America and a more secure globe.”
The bill would authorize the president, in coordination with
the Secretary of State, to: “Initiate and conduct negotiations with appropriate
counterparts of the Government of the Republic of Panama to reacquire the
Panama Canal.”
Trump in December had complained about the deal signed by
former President Carter, saying: “Carter foolishly gave it away, for One
Dollar.”
That is an apparent reference to the symbolic sale of the canal that was accompanied by
numerous other provisions in the Carter-Torrijos Treaties signed in 1977 that
transferred control of the canal to Panama.
An initial draft of Johnson’s bill authorized re-acquisition
of the canal for the symbolic amount of $1.
The bill also directs the president to submit a report to Congress within 180 days of passage “detailing the progress of the negotiations as well as the potential challenges and anticipated outcomes.”
Also,
Trump refused to commit to not using the U.S. military to take
control of the Panama Canal, saying at a press conference from Mar-a-Lago: “I’m
not going to commit to that. It might be that you have to do something. Look,
the Panama Canal is vital to our country, it’s being operated by China, China.
And we gave the Panama Canal to Panama, we didn’t give it to China.”
Despite Johnson’s bill, the idea of the U.S. taking control
of the Panama Canal — as well as acquiring Greenland — is facing skepticism from other Capitol Hill Republicans.
For example, Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger
Wicker (R-MS) said recently about Trump’s ambitions of taking control of the
Panama Canal & Greenland: “I think he was speaking aspirationally.”
My 2 Cents: True as Wicker said Trump was speaking aspirationally, because Trump is an “ass” on those two topics as well as acquiring Canada as our 51st state, and who know what other wild ideas his little pea brain comes up with as wishful thinking as seen here to see what I mean:
1. Largest migrant deportation program in
the history of America
2. Pardon the January 6 Capitol riot
prisoners
3. Terminate electric vehicle mandate
4. Increase fracking (drill, drill, drill)
5. End the war in Ukraine
6. Roll back protections for transgender students
Okay, ‘nough said – Trump’s
wild accusations speak for themselves, right Mr. Musk? Oops!!!
Thanks
for stopping by.
Monday, December 30, 2024
War over H1B Visas: Musk vs. MAGA as Trump Flips to Musk after 2016 Election Lie
Click here to see this short video introduction on the on-going battle over the H1B visa program and as posted here and below also.
Extract and Basic Summary: A civil war is now brewing between Elon Musk and his DOGE partner Vivek Ramaswamy, and the MAGA supporters of Trump.
Many of the open warfare is seen in the video and remarks
and in this earlier post.
The DOGE twosome has found themselves on the opposite end of
the legal immigration debate with the anti-immigration contingent of the MAGA
base over the H1B visa program.
Musk, has defended
foreign-born engineers and said about
the MAGA types: “Those contemptible fools must be removed from the Republican
Party, root and stem. I’m referring to are those in the Republican Party who
are hateful, unrepentant racists. They will absolutely be the downfall of the
Republican Party if they are not removed.”
Ramaswamy further ignited the firestorm when he argued: “The lack of U.S.-born engineers in the job market was due to American culture that has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long.”
Musk also defended Ramaswamy’s
remarks.
Trump then flip-flopped and lies (his trademark) and now agrees with Musk and Ramaswamy even after ran against the program in his 2016 election campaign, but now supports them.
Trump now even says has lots of those visa holders working for him at Mar-a-Lago and other places …. Oops!!! (High or low wages, I wonder which)???
My 2 Cents: Simply stated Trump and the DOGE two-some are not to be
trusted or believed on any matters dealing with government programs or policy with
their crazy insane self-centered suggestions or proposals whatsoever, period.
At least in my view.
All I ask is do the
extensive research and hopefully you will reach the same logical conclusion,
too.
Thanks for stopping by.
Monday, December 16, 2024
Musk & Ramaswamy: Axe in Hand After SS, Medicare, Medicaid, and ACA Time to Stop Them
From MARKET WATCH
the two billionaire thugs not associated with government now more or less
running government for Trump with this headline:
“How Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy teamed up to gut $2 trillion of
government spending”
Their DOGE gimmick (not
government approved agency) will have to go after Social Security,
Medicare, and Medicaid to hit its targets. Some in Washington don’t believe it
stands a chance.
A little over a year ago, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy
didn’t know each other. Then the two hopped on X Spaces along with venture
capitalist David Sacks. Musk told
Ramaswamy, who was running for the Republican presidential nomination at the
time: “I would like to know more
about you.”
Now, Musk and Ramaswamy
have teamed up to cut $2 trillion in annual government spending, or more
than 30% of the federal budget, within two years.
They’ve been tasked by Trump
to run a department focused on “government efficiency,” called DOGE. The advisory body, which
will not be an official department of the federal government,
promises to radically shake up the federal bureaucracy and massively cut
federal spending in the process.
Trump said about DOGE
at a press conference: “They’ve been
finding things you wouldn’t believe. We’re looking to save maybe $2 trillion
and it’ll have no impact. Actually it will make life better, but it will have
no impact on people.” (NOTE: Another Trump whopper)!!!
A raft of successful entrepreneurs have descended on
Washington from Silicon Valley to help with the new Trump administration’s
transition, many connections with billionaire venture capitalist Peter Thiel
who was a liberal redoubt in 2017, then he broke the mold as the only Silicon
Valley billionaire to openly back Trump.
Musk and Ramaswamy wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion article two
weeks after Trump’s victory: “The
entrenched and ever-growing bureaucracy represents an existential threat to our
republic, and politicians have abetted it for too long. We will serve as
outside volunteers, not federal officials or employees. Unlike government
commissions or advisory committees, we won’t just write reports or cut ribbons.
We’ll cut costs.”
DOGE doubts: Some in Washington don’t believe Musk and Ramaswamy’s
effort stands much of a chance.
Elaine Kamarck, President
Clinton’s National Partnership for Reinventing Government in the 1990 said:
“Absolutely no one who knows anything
about the federal government can imagine cutting that amount of money in that
amount of time.”
The Clinton effort to cut spending and modernize government
services saved $112 billion over eight years, and led to significant reductions
in the federal workforce, real estate footprint, and government regulations according to an indeendent analysis at the
time.
That was in stark contrast to the so-called Grace Commission under President
Reagan, which like DOGE, was led by business executives with little or no
government experience. Over a two-year period, the committee of 161 business
executives produced a report with thousands of recommendations that were largely ignored by Congress and never
implemented. One major difference between the two efforts was that the
Clinton approach was not adversarial and relied on the advice of career civil
servants as well as the perspective of outside consultants and business
leaders.
Kamarck said: “You need buy-in from the civil servants
themselves. They’re the ones who are going to know where the inefficiencies
are. Musk and Ramaswamy’s confrontational approach to the civil service could
also be counterproductive in the long run, asking whether a career civil
servant intricacies if its leaders have been calling them “lazy and
good-for-nothing for two years.”
Trump, Musk, and Ramaswamy
didn’t respond to requests for comment.
The stated goal is to
downsize the federal workforce by eliminating the ability of government
employees to work from home writing: “Requiring
federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave
of voluntary terminations that we welcome. If federal employees don’t want to
show up, American taxpayers shouldn’t pay them for the Covid-era privilege of
staying home.”
Jacqueline Simon,
policy director at the AFGE Employees which represents 800,000 Federal workers said:
“That while some federal employees may
leave if their remote work privileges are revoked, it will likely be the most
talented and in-demand employees who do so. If there’s another employer down
the street paying the same salary that will let someone telework a couple of
days a week, there will be people who say: Forget about this, I can get a better
hybrid deal elsewhere.”
The heads of DOGE may also be overestimating the extent of remote work taking place, as the OMB reports that that 54% of government employees aren’t eligible for remote work at all jobs ranging from civilian military workers, to VA hospital nurses to border-patrol agents.
For federal employees
who are not eligible for a fully remote work arrangement, 79.4% of regular
working hours were spent in person, the OMB added.
DOGE is also a symbol of the power and reach of Thiel, and his brand of rightwing nationalism, which at one time marked him as an eccentric in tech circles, but now is becoming a dominant strand of thought in the industry.
Thiel biographer
Max Chafkin wrote his 2021 book: “Thiel is sometimes portrayed as the tech
industry’s token conservative, a view that wildly understates his influence:
The Contrarian, more than any other Silicon Valley entrepreneur has been
responsible for creating the ideology that has come to define Silicon Valley:
that technological progress should be pursued relentlessly with little, if any,
regard for potential costs or dangers to society.”
Both Ramaswamy and Musk were connected to Thiel long before they were household names. Musk and Thiel became business associates when their payment companies merged in 2000 to create PayPal.
Ramaswamy, meanwhile, was one in a long series of young, conservative businessmen that Thiel has backed. Thiel’s venture-capital firm invested early in Ramaswamy’s biotechnology company, Roivant Sciences Ltd.
When Musk and Ramaswamy first met virtually last
year on the X
Space discussion, Ramaswamy noted that “our mutual friend, Peter,” was
also a seed investor in another Ramaswamy company, ETF provider Strive Asset
Management.
Sacks, the other participant in that discussion, has been a long-time associate of Thiel’s, co-writing a book with him in 1995 called “The Diversity Myth,” and serving as chief operating officer of PayPal, the company cofounded by Thiel and Musk.
FYI: Trump has named Sacks as his White House’s AI and crypto Czar.
Thiel speaks in revolutionary terms, comparing the Democratic
Party in a November interview to “The empire in Star Wars whereas he and his fellow Silicon Valley
billionaires are a ragtag rebel alliance comprising a diverse and heterogenous
group that is fighting to overthrow stifling orthodoxy.”
Whether the American people voted in November for a
revolution, or even an unprecedented downsizing of the federal government and
the services it provides, is another question.
Kamarck argued that when Americans actually start to look at
the services that would need to be cut to radically reduce the size of
government, they begin to balk at making those changes.
In 2024, Social Security,
Medicare, and Medicaid accounted for nearly 44% of all government spending.
Interest payments accounted for about 13%, national defense 14%, and veterans benefits 6%.
This
leaves precious little to cut, and even the remainder includes Republican
priorities like border patrol and transportation infrastructure spending.
Trump well understands the sanctity of these programs for average
Americans. He said Monday that DOGE: “Will never cut Social Security,
things like that. It’s just waste, fraud, and abuse.”
Kamarck said: “Everybody hates government in general, but
likes it in the particular. If they go after Social Security and Medicare —
which they would need to do to make the numbers they’re talking — all hell will
break loose, and the first person to be mad at them will be the president
himself.”
My 2 Cents: This rundown on Musk and Ramaswamy via their DOGE cuts and such underscores and shows that those two are way, way out touch and in way over their heads on government of, by, and for the people.
They must be ignored and cast aside since the public will not tolerate what their plans are for cuts to SS, Medicare, and Medicaid and getting rid of the ACA.
Mark my words, the public
will not tolerate their craziness one second.
Then Trump will blame them
and cast them aside as he always does when things don’t go his way. That his
M.O. and it’s as I’ve said many times before, it’s in his DNA.
Thanks for stopping by,