Sunday, February 23, 2025

Conspiracy theory spreading: Social media say Musk's Starlink interfered with 2024 election

 


2024 U.S. ELECTIONS RAPID RESEARCH BLOG RAPID RESEARCH NOTE

This is part of an ongoing series of rapid research blog posts and rapid research analysis about the 2024 U.S. elections from the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public. 

This research memo identifies election rumors using a combination of qualitative, quantitative, digital ethnographic, and visual, methodologies. It was cross-posted on the CIP’s election rumor research Substack newsletter.

Since Trump won the presidential election, rumors and audience attention have focused on interpreting the results. A new rumor has emerged on the left as part of this collective sense making process. 

Social media users speculated that Starlink, a satellite-based Internet provider owned by Elon Musk, was used to alter election results in Trump’s favor. 

Note: Fact-checks by PolitiFact and AFP have debunked these claims. 

The rhetoric and tropes of this rumor have the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory, which academics typically define as an explanation for social or political events that suggests without verifiable evidence that perceived ill-intentioned actors are secretly plotting to alter social, political, and economic institutions to their benefit — such as elections. 

In this research note, we analyze the spread of this conspiracy theory on X and its rumoring dynamics within left-leaning audiences on the platform.

Left-leaning accounts with relatively small followings (ranging from 10k to 200k) have driven the conversation about this conspiracy theory on X, especially in its early stages on November 9 and 10. 

Most engagement on X comes from tweets posted by these accounts over these two days. 

On November 11, tweets rumoring about this conspiracy theory continued, but got fewer retweets. At the same time, several right-leaning accounts joined the conversation, mainly to mock left-leaning speculation and dismiss the rumor as a conspiracy theory.

Analyzing the spread of the conspiracy theory:  The crux of the theory postulates that Starlink was used to alter vote counts in Trump’s favor. They speculate, without evidence, that tabulators that are used to count paper ballots, were tampered with via an internet connection: namely Musk’s Starlink internet provider.

It is important to note that most machines used in U.S. elections are not connected to the Internet

My 2 Cents: Maybe a deep dive is now required in light of of the Musk DOGE shenanigans. Just a thought.


Monday, February 3, 2025

Trump & Musk Are Out of Control: For our survival they have to be and must be stopped

Elon Musk is not officially a Federal employee 
(Not by any law, standard, or process)

First, this shocking FORTUNE story about Elon Musk and his illegal access to classified, sensitive, and personal information with this headline:

“Musk’s DOGE gets access to classified USAID info after security chiefs tried to block move – then were put on leave, officials say”

The disgusting, evil, and nasty Elon Musk must be prosecuted – he has no security clearance, no security access to classified, or sensitive personal information or data, and had no reason to gain the information, and he even is not a valid nor legal government official. Trump and Musk have effectively found a backdoor way to seize Congress’s power to appropriate funds for the executive branch — a move that would make it easier to cut the budget but also challenge basic democratic norms. 

Don Moynihan, a public policy professor at the University of Michigan said: If Musk can single-handedly shut off spending for one government agency, he can do it for any another. He can shut off payment of federal employee salaries. He can shut down federal contracts. It is an extraordinary abuse of public power.”

------------------------------------------------------------

Then this second shocking story from AP News relates to the above article and current Trump & Musk craziness:

“Elon Musk’s DOGE commission gains access to sensitive Treasury payment systems”

WASHINGTON — The DOGE run by Trump’s billionaire adviser and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, has gained access to sensitive Treasury data including Social Security, and Medicare customer payment systems, according to two people familiar with the situation. 

The move by DOGE, a Trump administration task force assigned to find ways to fire federal workers, cut programs and slash federal regulations, means it could have wide leeway to access important taxpayer data, among other things.

NOTED: The New York Times first reported the news of the group’s access of the massive federal payment system. The two people who spoke to the AP spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, Sen. Ron Wyden (R-OR) sent a letter to Trump’s Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressing concern:That officials associated with Musk may have intended to access these payment systems to illegally withhold payments to any number of programs. To put it bluntly, these payment systems simply cannot fail, and any politically motivated meddling in them risks severe damage to our country and the economy.”

The news also comes after Treasury’s acting Deputy Secretary David Lebryk resigned after more than 30 years of service. Lebryk resigned his position after Musk and his DOGE organization requested access to sensitive Treasury data. 

In his letter to the employees he said: Our service performs some of the most vital functions in government. Our work may be unknown to most of the public, but doesn’t mean it isn’t exceptionally important. I am grateful for having been able to work alongside the nation’s best and most talented operations staff.”

Musk responded to the departure of Lebryk on his X page saying:The DOGE team discovered, among other things, that payment approval officers at Treasury were instructed always to approve payments, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups. They literally never denied a payment in their entire career. Not even once.”

NOTED: Musk DID NOT provide proof of that claim. I suppose he is covered by what Trump labeled him based on this story

Trump makes Elon Musk a “Special Government Employee” amid accusations of takeover.

I'm Mr. GOP – Like it or get out of the party 

My 2 Cents: These articles and the Trump-Musk moves are illegal and unlawful.

Lots of legal cases are forthcoming to nail them both. We need to stop them and stop them now. 

The nation’s future is at stake and many lives, too. I fear the worst is yet to come.

Thanks for stopping by.

Monday, January 27, 2025

Battle of AI Giants: China’s New “DeepSeek” vs. “U.S. Nvidia” Winner TBA

Race to Top of AI Mountain to Win the Gold Medal  

Rather long post but timely and critical, too. AI battle heats up as reported BARRON'S here with this headline

“Don’t Fight DeepSeek Learn From It”

Some of these concerns appear overblown. The real issue is China’s challenge to U.S. technology leadership posed by rapid advancements in advanced industries including artificial intelligence, semiconductors, robotics, fintech, and electric vehicles. 

Instead of blaming China for its attempt to lead in some key technologies, the West should learn from China’s desire and capability to pivot. These insights would help the U.S. decide whether to compete against China or to cooperate with China in advanced technologies.  

For decades, China was perceived primarily as the world’s factory, a place where low-cost manufacturing thrived. Recent years have shifted this perception dramatically. The U.S. and other Western nations have begun to recognize China’s burgeoning role as a hub of innovation. This transformation is evident in the rise of Chinese tech giants, advancements in various high-tech industries, and the increasing global influence of Chinese innovations. 

The West’s apprehension about China’s rise as an innovation powerhouse is recent. Historically, there was a belief that China couldn’t innovate because its economic model was controlled by the state, and that was thought to impede innovation. The West was slow to understand that China has long desired to shift from “Made in China” (with cheap labor) to “Innovate in China” (with scientific talent). 

China invented paper and fireworks in ancient times, but in recent history — since its economic reforms in 1979 — it has emphasized innovation by improving or applying existing ideas learned from the West (U.S. mostly). China’s approach to innovation includes: (1) strong government backing, and (2) focus on practical applications.

That propelled China to remarkable innovations in several fields:

First, China has redefined internet and mobile phone applications. The rise of platforms such as Alibaba’s Alipay and Tencent’s Alipay’s WeChat, and Tencent’s Alipay that has transformed how people interact, shop, and conduct business online, revolutionizing mobile payments and social media, respectively. These innovations have set new standards globally and demonstrated China’s ability to lead in digital technology. 

Second, China’s innovative prowess in EVs has taken the world by surprise. Two prominent examples are CATL’s battery technology and BYD’s EV manufacturing. Elon Musk laughed at the poor design and quality of China’s BYD cars in 2011, but in 2023 he admitted that BYD is now a competitor of Tesla’s after BYD became dominant in the EV market. With over 110,000 R&D engineers, BYD obtained 538 new patent authorizations in just the first two weeks of January, an increase of 216% over the same period last year.

Third, in telecommunications technology, Huawei’s significant advancements in the development and deployment of fifth-generation networks have prompted concerns and bans in the U.S. driven by national security. Nonetheless, Huawei remains a major competitor in the global telecom sector, competing with other industry giants like Samsung, Apple, and Ericsson.

Fourth, China has poured enormous resources into AI development, resulting in groundbreaking advancements in natural language processingautonomous systems, and algorithm-driven manufacturing. It isn’t just DeepSeek. China’s rapid development in AI is squeezing the U.S.-led semiconductor ecosystem.

Fifth, China’s advancements in robotics and autonomous driving further illustrate its innovative capabilities.

The country is ahead of the U.S. in some areas of autonomous driving and robotics, driven by significant investments and a favorable regulatory environment. These developments are reshaping industries and positioning China as a global leader in these fields. 

Despite U.S. export controls on 24 types of chip-making equipment and three categories of software essential for semiconductor development, AI has the potential to help China develop its advanced semiconductor capabilities. 

The U.S. has often accused China of technology theft, but China’s innovation advantage lies in its ability to combine rapid technological development with a supportive ecosystem. 

These factors created the major forces driving their innovations:

1. First, its vast human capital, with a large pool of STEM graduates, provides a strong foundation for technological advancement.

2. Second, China’s culture of hard work and perseverance fosters an environment conducive to innovation.

3. Third, substantial government support through policies and funding has been instrumental in driving research research and development. 

4. Finally, China’s economic heft, with the world’s second-largest domestic market, allows for the rapid scaling of new technologies. The West’s reaction to China’s innovation highlights a sense of hypocrisy and insecurity. Initially, China was criticized for not innovating enough. As China emerges as a leading innovator, the West accuses it of stealing technology and imposes various bans out of fear 

Instead of using export controls to panicky response to block China’s desire to innovate, it would be more constructive to learn more about China’s innovation ecosystem to advance humanity as this old Chinese proverb says:Understanding yourself first and then your opponent’s is the best way to ensure your success.” 

Related headline article from FORTUNE: Chinese AI “DeepSeek” threatening American AI “Nvidia” for AI dominance.

My 2 Cents: I have spoken awhile about the good, the bad, and the ugly of AI. The above article takes a totally different view of how to compete rather than overtake China’s AI growth on a world scale.

 Article Intelligence (AI), the science and engineering of making intelligent machines, combines algorithms (unambiguous instructions) with data to perform functions similar to human decision-making.

* The first generation of AI, in the 1980’s and 1990’s, could apply rules written by humans to data to create outputs.

* The second generation of AI, in the 2000’s, could learn, meaning that programs could take data and guidance provided by humans, independently identify rules, and then apply those rules to new data to create outputs.

* Now, the third generation of AI, which we are currently in, seeks to incorporate “deep learning.” 

Deep learning permits programs to autonomously learn rules and automatically judge new data to create outputs, without human intervention. AI offers pros and cons like anything new on the world stage for example as explained above and in this fine article here with this introductory question: “Artificial intelligence prevents us from being inundated with irrelevant information – and that raises an important question: Who determines what is relevant or irrelevant?  And how do they decide?

A lot of info on this topic is growing faster than the AI field of innovation as out above – again, the good, the bad, and the ugly. 

I am not an expert by any means on this subject – only from what I read and hear and watch about AI and its growth and purpose and benefits.

Quite frankly it scares me the most in the bad and ugly parts not the good for good is supposed to be good as they say for everything and everyone.

But, as the question above asks I also ask:Who determines the good over the bad and the ugly. Or as also stated above: What is relevant and irrelevant and who determines?” 

Thanks for stopping by. 

Saturday, January 25, 2025

Trump Vis-á-Vis Kim Jong-un: Praises Kim While Taking Swiping at Obama & Biden

Will resume relations with Smart Guy Kim

Trump first meets Kim in Singapore 
(June 2018)
(Ouchie: Squeeze handshake is Trump's trademark)

Trump has gone off the deep end of the reality standard after only a few days back in power – this THE INDEPENDENT article headline cites one key example and pretty much says it all:

“Trump describes North Korea leader Kim Jong-Un in two words as he takes swipe at Obama and Biden”

Trump described Kim as a “smart guy” during an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News on Thursday (23 January), saying: “He’s not a religious zealot. He happens to be a smart guy. Kim Jong-Un is a smart guy.”

Trump repeated his good relations with the North Korean leader even as ties between Washington and Pyongyang deteriorated underJoe Biden’s administration

My 2 Cents: If there are two areas of the world that I know well and have studied for years including 47 weeks studying their languages while I was an interrogator in the Marine Corps, they are North Korea and Russia, plus I served in Korea for nearly 12 years. 

I do agree with Trump when he says that Kim, Jong-un is “a smart guy” true but only smart in an ugly and evil way in his methods and goals, just like Putin. 

Kim, Jong-un even had his half-brother, Kim Jong-nam assassinated on February 13, 2017. 

Kim Jong-nam died after being exposed to VX nerve agent at Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Malaysia. 

It is widely believed that he was killed on the orders of his half-brother. Four North Korean suspects left the airport shortly after the attack, traveling back to Pyongyang. 

Plus, Kim, Jong-un had his once-powerful uncle, Chang, Song-taek executed after being purged for “acts of treachery” in 2013. 

Kim and Putin both know Trump well and what precisely what makes him tick, too. 

They both play Trump a fiddle to get his kudos and what they want from him, and it seems to work, too, e.g., North Korean troops now helping Putin in his war against Ukraine, and Trump doesn't seem to mind much, but he said he will look into the matter as reported on here.

Thanks for stopping by.


Monday, January 20, 2025

Two of Six Billionaires: In Deep For & With Trump Are Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg

Two of Top Six Deep in Trump's Political Circle
(With lots of money and influence)

From the WASHINGTON EXAMINER with an interesting story and catchy headline that is direct line to and from pleasing Trump and vice versa as he enters office again:

“Big Tech favored with better seats than Cabinet nominees at Trump’s inauguration”

To set the scene click here for reporter video.

Elon Musk has emerged as a top Trump ally since vigorously campaigning for the president last fall and subsequently being appointed to lead the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and of course dropping some $250M to help Trump win the election.

Mark Zuckerberg recently rolled back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies at Meta, a key priority for Trump during the campaign.

The Zuck also rescinded controversial fact-checking policies, which critics had argued were biased against Trump and other Republicans.

All of the tech gurus have flocked to meet with Trump at Mar-a-Lago, the Trump Florida home since he won, as they say “to kiss the ring” some other body part  to get in his good  graces – and apparently it is working.

My 2 Cents: Elon Musk is more than all that mentioned above and in spades as they expression says.

He is in fact acting as Trump’s “Co-President” and make no mistake about that fact.

Trump listens to Musk and explicitly hears Ka-Ching, Ka-Ching the sound that reverberates back from Musk.

More will follow on this subject as we move a long in Trump 20 – bet on.

Thanks for stopping by.


Sunday, January 19, 2025

Israel-Hamas Update: Three Women Released & Cross Back into Israel Custody

Trump takes credit where none is due as always

From NBC News on the Gaza Hostage Release: An NBC News crew in Gaza witnessed the handover to the Red Cross, which then transferred three women to the Israeli military.

Video updates (click hereoffer details thus far:

What we know:

Ø  The three women hostages released taken during the October 7 Hamas terror attack are: Romi Gonen, Emily Damari, and Doron Steinbrecher.

Ø  The three women taken hostage by Hamas have crossed into Israel as part of a long-awaited ceasefire deal that came after 15 months of near-constant war in Gaza.

Ø  It appears that the ceasefire is holding. 

Ø  Palestinian families are returning to Rafah, mostly on foot.

Ø  Under the terms of the complex three-phase deal, four additional living hostages are expected to be released in seven days.

Ø About 90 Palestinians in Israeli prison and detention are expected to be released.

Some 46,800 Palestinians have been killed in the fighting.

More than 1,200 Israelis were killed on October 7, 2023, and during military operations.

My 2 Cents: Good news – the plans seems to be working and let’s hope it sticks. 

As noted with the brief from President Biden it does seem to be on schedule as agreed upon. 

Now as noted in the quote from Trump above he has to be front and center as usual in anything good while blasting other painting them as awful. 

He is a pitiful human being; truly a disgrace with no dignity at all, only for himself.

Thanks for stopping by.


Thursday, January 16, 2025

Musk. Ramaswamy & 10 Other Billionaires: President Biden Warns of Oligarchy in Trump 2.0

Musk; Ramaswamy; Bezos; Zuckerberg; Altman 
(Five billionaire$ ki$$ Trump’$ ring & a$$)

Amazing article from MARKET WATCH (Barron’s) is pretty startling and right in line with Joe Biden’s remarks about the superrich taking over the Trump administration with this headline:

“Trump’s Team is stocked with billionaires. Why the Super Rich are taking over Washington”

President-elect Donald Trump is adding ultra-wealthy people to his administration to reward their loyalty and to shake up the agencies they are about to lead.

This headline article also from MARKET WATCH is:

“Biden warns that an oligarchy is taking hold in America. There is data to back him up”

Wealth disparity in the U.S. has grown since 2009, according to Fed data, with a significant increase in the share of the nation’s wealth held by the 238,000 richest people

Trump’s administration is shaping up to be filled with super wealthy individuals, many of whom could directly benefit from being close to the center of power.   

Billionaire Elon Musk is spearheading a new advisory unit (DOGE) aimed at cutting government waste alongside biotech billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy, and there are at least 10 other billionaires nominated to top roles.  At least six others have a net worth of $150 million or more

* Billionaire Howard Lutnick, investment firm CEO Cantor Fitzgerald, was nominated as commerce secretary.

* Multimillionaire Scott Bessent, Founder of the investment firm Key Square Capital Management, was nominated to lead Treasury. 

* Liberty Energy CEO Chris Wright, net worth of about $170 million, according to Bloomberg, may head the energy department. 

If confirmed, these and other super wealthy people — many without government experience or a working understanding of the departments they may oversee — will hold considerable sway over public policy. In return, they, either individually or through their business interests, could potentially benefit from policies and regulations they oversee.

President Biden raised alarm over the level of wealth held by members of Trump’s incoming team in his farewell address from the Oval Office drawing attention to the potential influence of tech entrepreneurs saying:Today, an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead.”

One reason Trump is nominating rich people is to reward their loyalty        — Wright, for instance, is among vocal domestic oil-and-gas industry supporters — but it’s also because they can shake up the agencies they are about to lead.

For example, in a statement made after nominating North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum to lead the interior department Trump said he would chair a National Energy Council that would:Oversee the path to U.S. ENERGY DOMINANCE by cutting red tape, enhancing private sector investments across all sectors of the Economy, and by focusing on INNOVATION over longstanding, but totally unnecessary, regulation.”

Donald Sherman, Chief Counsel for (CREW) said:Hiring billionaires and others with vast financial entanglements” is ensuring they abide by federal conflict of interest statutes. That has a tangible impact on whether the government is prioritizing the interests of the American public, or for everyday people who voted for, or didn’t vote for Trump. Or that versus the narrow financial interests of the individuals who are running these agencies.”

Brian Hughes, a spokesman for the transition of Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance, said:All nominees and appointees will comply with the ethical obligations of their respective agencies.” 

As an advisor, Musk doesn’t have to comply with the federal criminal conflict of interest statute, so he doesn’t need to sell shares in his companies. That billionaires and other wealthy folks — including mega donors —are filling the ranks of top government jobs in the U.S. is unsurprising to Krcmaric and other authors of a Northwestern University study titled “Billionaire Politicians: A Global Perspective,” published in June. 

According to their research, 11.7% of about 2,000 billionaires tracked by Forbes “held or sought political office through about the middle of 2023.”

That is particularly true in autocracies such as China and Russia where the rich are motivated to enter politics to protect their wealth, the authors said.

The statistics back it up: 36.4% of Chinese billionaires, and 21.3% of Russian billionaires held or sought political office through the summer of 2023. 

In the U.S. and other democracies, the wealthy had typically achieved similar goals through big, anonymous donations. Only 3.7% of U.S. billionaires sought or held office in the period studied for the paper.

Stephen Nelson, associate professor of political science at Northwestern said:We don’t have data right now to suggest out of the total pool of billionaires how many are currently serving in politics Trump’s incoming team seems to be skewed more heavily toward ultra-rich people, which suggests the U.S. is moving in a particular direction.”

Richard Painter, a professor of corporate law at the University of MN an Ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush from 2005-07 said:Billionaires often have had roles in previous U.S. administrations. The super wealthy don’t take these jobs for the money, but for the opportunity to participate in government and take on a new challenge, Painter told Barron’s. They also get a tax benefit,” he said. Although government officials must sell holdings that may pose a conflict of interest, they often don’t have to pay capital-gains taxes on these ethics-related sales if they are issued a “certificate of divestiture” from the Office of Government Ethics and invest the proceeds from the sale in Treasuries or a government-approved diversified fund. Having to sell a concentrated, long-held investment can benefit someone who has been hesitant to diversify their holdings because of embedded capital gains. There’s also the broader, and again, non-legal question, of how a government of super wealthy individuals serves a public that isn’t nearly that rich. It’s a lot of billionaires coming in to solve the problems of the working people. We’ll see how that works out.” 

Whether the individuals selected for government roles have legal conflicts of interests with their jobs will be revealed when financial disclosure forms are filed and made available to the public. But even then, the extensive financial footprint of the richest nominees will make it challenging to learn all the potential conflicts that could touch the work they do and the sectors they oversee.  The roles that Wright, Bessent, Lutnick, and others may soon play also extends beyond legal conflict of interest questions to the appearance of a conflict.

Sherman also said about Wright:It’s certainly reasonable for the American public to question the appointment of someone who is heavily invested in one part of the energy sector, being appointed to a role where they are meant to oversee the entirety of the energy sector. It’s like a cafeteria run by somebody who owns a candy shop.” 

My 2 Cents: President Biden stated the obvious and the above article reinforces his statement – proof meets pudding.

Elon Musk and dozen others in the White House inner circle which is pitiful to say least about him and his goals for Trump with and I might not a drop of legal authority for the DOGE crazy scheme and nonsense.

But we shall see as time goes by and thus far it has not been pretty in fact based on the above info it’s worse and apt to get worse. 

Thanks for stopping by.

Friday, January 10, 2025

Trump Pie in the Sky: GOP Willing to Help With His Metaphorical Carrots on a Very Big Stick

 

GOP House Bill Says Ok Purchase the Panama Canal 

Catchy article with this short video that explains the issue:

The short answer to the question is: No

The NEWS NATION story headline:

“House Republican bill would pave way for Trump to acquire Panama Canal for U.S.”

Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD) introduces a bill that would authorize the president to purchase the Panama Canal and put it under U.S. control, an acquisition that Trump has been pushing over the last several weeks.

Johnson plans to introduce the Panama Canal Repurchase Act, saying in a press statement: President Trump is right to consider repurchasing the Panama Canal. China’s interest in and presence around the canal is a cause for concern. America must project strength abroad – owning and operating the Panama Canal might be an important step towards a stronger America and a more secure globe.”

The bill would authorize the president, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to:Initiate and conduct negotiations with appropriate counterparts of the Government of the Republic of Panama to reacquire the Panama Canal.”

Trump in December had complained about the deal signed by former President Carter, saying:Carter foolishly gave it away, for One Dollar.”

That is an apparent reference to the symbolic sale of the canal that was accompanied by numerous other provisions in the Carter-Torrijos Treaties signed in 1977 that transferred control of the canal to Panama.

An initial draft of Johnson’s bill authorized re-acquisition of the canal for the symbolic amount of $1.

The bill also directs the president to submit a report to Congress within 180 days of passage “detailing the progress of the negotiations as well as the potential challenges and anticipated outcomes.” 

Also, Trump refused to commit to not using the U.S. military to take control of the Panama Canal, saying at a press conference from Mar-a-Lago: “I’m not going to commit to that. It might be that you have to do something. Look, the Panama Canal is vital to our country, it’s being operated by China, China. And we gave the Panama Canal to Panama, we didn’t give it to China.”

Despite Johnson’s bill, the idea of the U.S. taking control of the Panama Canal — as well as acquiring Greenland — is facing skepticism from other Capitol Hill Republicans.

For example, Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-MS) said recently about Trump’s ambitions of taking control of the Panama Canal & Greenland: “I think he was speaking aspirationally.”

My 2 Cents: True as Wicker said Trump was speaking aspirationally, because Trump is an “ass” on those two topics as well as acquiring Canada as our 51st state, and who know what other wild ideas his little pea brain comes up with as wishful thinking as seen here to see what I mean:

1. Largest migrant deportation program in the history of America

2. Pardon the January 6 Capitol riot prisoners

3. Terminate electric vehicle mandate

4. Increase fracking (drill, drill, drill)

5. End the war in Ukraine

6. Roll back protections for transgender students

Okay, ‘nough said – Trump’s wild accusations speak for themselves, right Mr. Musk? Oops!!!

Thanks for stopping by.

Monday, December 30, 2024

War over H1B Visas: Musk vs. MAGA as Trump Flips to Musk after 2016 Election Lie

The Battle Ground Issue

Musk Hard Line Stance on the H1B Visas
(He used to enter U.S. from So. Africa)

Trump aligns with Musk on the issue

Trump in March 2016 during his campaign
(Was against the H1B program in general)

Click here to see this short video introduction on the on-going battle over the H1B visa program and as posted here and below also.

Extract and Basic Summary: civil war is now brewing between Elon Musk and his DOGE partner Vivek Ramaswamy, and the MAGA supporters of Trump.

Many of the open warfare is seen in the video and remarks and in this earlier post.

The DOGE twosome has found themselves on the opposite end of the legal immigration debate with the anti-immigration contingent of the MAGA base over the H1B visa program

Musk, has defended foreign-born engineers and said about the MAGA types:Those contemptible fools must be removed from the Republican Party, root and stem. I’m referring to are those in the Republican Party who are hateful, unrepentant racists. They will absolutely be the downfall of the Republican Party if they are not removed.”

Ramaswamy further ignited the firestorm when he argued:The lack of U.S.-born engineers in the job market was due to American culture that has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long.” 

Musk also defended Ramaswamy’s remarks. 

Trump then flip-flopped and lies (his trademark) and now agrees with Musk and Ramaswamy even after ran against the program in his 2016 election campaign, but now supports them.

Trump now even says has lots of those visa holders working for him at Mar-a-Lago and other places …. Oops!!! (High or low wages, I wonder which)???

My 2 Cents: Simply stated Trump and the DOGE two-some are not to be trusted or believed on any matters dealing with government programs or policy with their crazy insane self-centered suggestions or proposals whatsoever, period. At least in my view.

All I ask is do the extensive research and hopefully you will reach the same logical conclusion, too.

Thanks for stopping by.

Monday, December 16, 2024

Musk & Ramaswamy: Axe in Hand After SS, Medicare, Medicaid, and ACA Time to Stop Them

 

Trump’s running wild Gruesome Twosome

From MARKET WATCH the two billionaire thugs not associated with government now more or less running government for Trump with this headline:

“How Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy teamed up to gut $2 trillion of government spending”

Their DOGE gimmick (not government approved agency) will have to go after Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid to hit its targets. Some in Washington don’t believe it stands a chance.

A little over a year ago, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy didn’t know each other. Then the two hopped on X Spaces along with venture capitalist David Sacks. Musk told Ramaswamy, who was running for the Republican presidential nomination at the time: “I would like to know more about you.”

Now, Musk and Ramaswamy have teamed up to cut $2 trillion in annual government spending, or more than 30% of the federal budget, within two years.

They’ve been tasked by Trump to run a department focused on “government efficiency,” called DOGE. The advisory body, which will not be an official department of the federal government, promises to radically shake up the federal bureaucracy and massively cut federal spending in the process.

Trump said about DOGE at a press conference:They’ve been finding things you wouldn’t believe. We’re looking to save maybe $2 trillion and it’ll have no impact. Actually it will make life better, but it will have no impact on people.” (NOTE: Another Trump whopper)!!!

A raft of successful entrepreneurs have descended on Washington from Silicon Valley to help with the new Trump administration’s transition, many connections with billionaire venture capitalist Peter Thiel who was a liberal redoubt in 2017, then he broke the mold as the only Silicon Valley billionaire to openly back Trump.

Musk and Ramaswamy wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion article two weeks after Trump’s victory:The entrenched and ever-growing bureaucracy represents an existential threat to our republic, and politicians have abetted it for too long. We will serve as outside volunteers, not federal officials or employees. Unlike government commissions or advisory committees, we won’t just write reports or cut ribbons. We’ll cut costs.” 

DOGE doubts: Some in Washington don’t believe Musk and Ramaswamy’s effort stands much of a chance.

Elaine Kamarck, President Clinton’s National Partnership for Reinventing Government in the 1990 said:Absolutely no one who knows anything about the federal government can imagine cutting that amount of money in that amount of time.”

The Clinton effort to cut spending and modernize government services saved $112 billion over eight years, and led to significant reductions in the federal workforce, real estate footprint, and government regulations according to an indeendent analysis at the time. 

That was in stark contrast to the so-called Grace Commission under President Reagan, which like DOGE, was led by business executives with little or no government experience. Over a two-year period, the committee of 161 business executives produced a report with thousands of recommendations that were largely ignored by Congress and never implemented. One major difference between the two efforts was that the Clinton approach was not adversarial and relied on the advice of career civil servants as well as the perspective of outside consultants and business leaders. 

Kamarck said: You need buy-in from the civil servants themselves. They’re the ones who are going to know where the inefficiencies are. Musk and Ramaswamy’s confrontational approach to the civil service could also be counterproductive in the long run, asking whether a career civil servant intricacies if its leaders have been calling them “lazy and good-for-nothing for two years.” 

Trump, Musk, and Ramaswamy didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The stated goal is to downsize the federal workforce by eliminating the ability of government employees to work from home writing:Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome. If federal employees don’t want to show up, American taxpayers shouldn’t pay them for the Covid-era privilege of staying home.”

Jacqueline Simon, policy director at the AFGE Employees which represents 800,000 Federal workers said:That while some federal employees may leave if their remote work privileges are revoked, it will likely be the most talented and in-demand employees who do so. If there’s another employer down the street paying the same salary that will let someone telework a couple of days a week, there will be people who say: Forget about this, I can get a better hybrid deal elsewhere.”

The heads of DOGE may also be overestimating the extent of remote work taking place, as the OMB reports that that 54% of government employees aren’t eligible for remote work at all jobs ranging from civilian military workers, to VA hospital nurses to border-patrol agents. 

For federal employees who are not eligible for a fully remote work arrangement, 79.4% of regular working hours were spent in person, the OMB added.

DOGE is also a symbol of the power and reach of Thiel, and his brand of rightwing nationalism, which at one time marked him as an eccentric in tech circles, but now is becoming a dominant strand of thought in the industry. 

Thiel biographer Max Chafkin wrote his 2021 book:Thiel is sometimes portrayed as the tech industry’s token conservative, a view that wildly understates his influence: The Contrarian, more than any other Silicon Valley entrepreneur has been responsible for creating the ideology that has come to define Silicon Valley: that technological progress should be pursued relentlessly with little, if any, regard for potential costs or dangers to society.” 

Both Ramaswamy and Musk were connected to Thiel long before they were household names. Musk and Thiel became business associates when their payment companies merged in 2000 to create PayPal. 

Ramaswamy, meanwhile, was one in a long series of young, conservative businessmen that Thiel has backed. Thiel’s venture-capital firm invested early in Ramaswamy’s biotechnology company, Roivant Sciences Ltd. 

When Musk and Ramaswamy first met virtually last year on the X Space discussion, Ramaswamy noted that “our mutual friend, Peter,” was also a seed investor in another Ramaswamy company, ETF provider Strive Asset Management.

Sacks, the other participant in that discussion, has been a long-time associate of Thiel’s, co-writing a book with him in 1995 called “The Diversity Myth,” and serving as chief operating officer of PayPal, the company cofounded by Thiel and Musk. 

FYI: Trump has named Sacks as his White House’s AI and crypto Czar.

Thiel speaks in revolutionary terms, comparing the Democratic Party in a November interview toThe empire in Star Wars whereas he and his fellow Silicon Valley billionaires are a ragtag rebel alliance comprising a diverse and heterogenous group that is fighting to overthrow stifling orthodoxy.”

Whether the American people voted in November for a revolution, or even an unprecedented downsizing of the federal government and the services it provides, is another question.

Kamarck argued that when Americans actually start to look at the services that would need to be cut to radically reduce the size of government, they begin to balk at making those changes.

In 2024, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid accounted for nearly 44% of all government spending.

Interest payments accounted for about 13%, national defense 14%, and veterans benefits 6%. 

This leaves precious little to cut, and even the remainder includes Republican priorities like border patrol and transportation infrastructure spending.

Trump well understands the sanctity of these programs for average Americans. He said Monday that DOGE: “Will never cut Social Security, things like that. It’s just waste, fraud, and abuse.”

Kamarck said:Everybody hates government in general, but likes it in the particular. If they go after Social Security and Medicare — which they would need to do to make the numbers they’re talking — all hell will break loose, and the first person to be mad at them will be the president himself.”

My 2 Cents: This rundown on Musk and Ramaswamy via their DOGE cuts and such underscores and shows that those two are way, way out touch and in way over their heads on government of, by, and for the people. 

They must be ignored and cast aside since the public will not tolerate what their plans are for cuts to SS, Medicare, and Medicaid and getting rid of the ACA. 

Mark my words, the public will not tolerate their craziness one second.

Then Trump will blame them and cast them aside as he always does when things don’t go his way. That his M.O. and it’s as I’ve said many times before, it’s in his DNA.

Thanks for stopping by,